July 2, 2009
Normally I avoid Karl Rove’s cookie-cutter partisan drivel at all costs, but this column from a few days ago, “ObamaCare Isn’t Inevitable”, made me laugh. Is he really trying to scuttle health care by dubbing it “ObamaCare?”
For some insight into Rove’s genius, here is what he said two months ago:
Mr. Obama is popular because he is a historic figure, has an attractive personality, has passed key legislation, and receives adoring press coverage.However, there are cautionary signs. Mr. Obama’s policies are less popular than his personality, the pace of polarization with Republicans has proceeded faster than ever in history, and independents are thinking more like Republicans on the issues and less like Democrats.
So Karl Rove, in all his infinite wisdom, realizes that the President is much more popular than his policies, but his strategy for defeating health care is to insert Obama’s name into the title of legislation?
Call me crazy, but it might just be a little counter intuitive to brand a controversial policy your fighting against with the name of the most popular man in American politics.
July 2, 2009
For $25,000 to $250,000, The Washington Post has offered lobbyists and association executives off-the-record, nonconfrontational access to “those powerful few”: Obama administration officials, members of Congress, and — at first — even the paper’s own reporters and editors.The astonishing offer was detailed in a flier circulated Wednesday to a health care lobbyist, who provided it to a reporter because the lobbyist said he felt it was a conflict for the paper to charge for access to, as the flier says, its “health care reporting and editorial staff.”
“Underwriting Opportunity: An evening with the right people can alter the debate,” says the one-page flier. “Underwrite and participate in this intimate and exclusive Washington Post Salon, an off-the-record dinner and discussion at the home of CEO and Publisher Katharine Weymouth. … Bring your organization’s CEO or executive director literally to the table. Interact with key Obama administration and congressional leaders.”
Looks like any credibility remaining over at the Washington Post after this and this and this has been destroyed.
Adding insult to injury, the story was broken by an online only publication. I can’t wait to see how the Post somehow blame this whole thing on bloggers.
July 1, 2009
After two weeks of setbacks, the last 24 hours have proven to be a turning point in the fight for universal health care.
As President Obama grabbed the spotlight and held another health care centered town hall, under the radar, more tangible steps were taken towards the elusive legislative victory that has haunted American Presidents for more than fifty years.
First, Al Franken was finally named the 2nd Senator of Minnesota, and more importantly, the 60th Democrat in the United States Senate. And perhaps seeing the tea leaves, but more likely just caving to the constant pressure from the White House, the American Medical Association suddenly reversed course and said they were “open” to a public option in the health care bill.
CNN) — The new president of the American Medical Association, which represents the interests of the nation’s doctors, said Wednesday the group is open to a government-funded health insurance option for people without coverage.Dr. J. James Rohack told CNN that the AMA supports an “American model” that includes both “a private system and a public system, working together.”In May, the AMA told a Senate committee it did not support a government-sponsored public health insurance option.
Meanwhile, Senators Ted Kennedy and Chris Dodd revised their own health care plan, which came under scrutiny two weeks ago for being too costly to garner widespread support, yet still kept the public option and brought the cost down to $600 billion over ten years.
WASHINGTON — Democrats on a key Senate Committee outlined a revised and far less costly health care plan Wednesday night that includes a government-run insurance option and an annual fee on employers who do not offer coverage to their workers.The plan carries a 10-year price tag of slightly over $600 billion, and would lead toward an estimated 97 percent of all Americans having coverage, according to the Congressional Budget Office, Sens. Edward M. Kennedy and Chris Dodd said in a letter to other members of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. The AP obtained a copy.By contrast, an earlier, incomplete proposal carried a price tag of roughly $1 trillion and would have left millions uninsured, CBO analysts said in mid-June.
While that is all terrific news, there is one more point to note: After President Obama held yet another hour long seminar on every facet of the debate today, critics claimed it was light on details. And I agree. He did not specify–when talking to the woman crying about the breast cancer she can’t afford treatment for–exactly how much she will have to pay in premiums for her six months of chemotherapy while including the costs of the future checkups, mammograms, and additional medication she will need if she were to survive.
But then again, I’m not exactly sure what these people are looking for when they say “details.” I am just curious as to who these people think has a better grasp of “details” and is willing to display it on camera ? Don’t get me wrong, criticism should be welcome on such a pressing issue and I don’t claim the President has a perfect plan anymore than anyone else does.
Just please name one person who is spitting out “details” better than this. Please. And obviously I’m excluding Peter Orzag, the White House Budget Director.
June 24, 2009
As covered ad nauseum in the press over the last two weeks, Twitter has been both an organizing force within Iran and a platform to broadcast injustice to the larger world. But it has never been a perfect source of reliability–while many reported with vigor and authenticity, others mistakenly posted false information, and still more used it inside the country to deliberately mislead.
But there was no one more accurate, more galvanizing, or more widely read than @Persiankiwi.
Both Andrew Sullivan and Nico Pitney quote him regularly and it is obvious many other reporters follow his lead. Often Persiankiwi posts news hours before any major news outlet does, always with a sense of optimism and hope, and the posts are invariably confirmed and reported later as truth.
This is a small synopsis of the guy/girl/group who ran the feed, as well as reflections on today’s ramped up violent attacks and its impact on the movement.
And here are Persiankiwi’s final anguished–and poetic–posts, spanning a few hours, from earlier today:
just in from Baharestan Sq – situation today is terrible – they beat the ppls like animals -I see many ppl with broken arms/legs/heads – blood everywhere – pepper gas like war -they were waiting for us – they all have guns and riot uniforms – it was like a mouse trap – ppl being shot like animalssaw 7/8 militia beating one woman with baton on ground – she had no defense nothing – #Iranelection sure that she is deadAllah – you are the creator of all and all must return to you – Allah Akbar -so many ppl arrested – young & old – they take ppl away -ppl run into alleys and militia standing there waiting – from 2 sides they attack ppl in middle of alleysall shops was closed – nowhere to go – they follow ppls with helicopters – smoke and fire is everywherephone line was cut and we lost internet – #Iranelection – getting more difficult to log into net -rumour they are tracking high use of phone lines to find internet users – must move from here now – #Iranelectionreports of street fighting in Vanak Sq, Tajrish sq, Azadi Sq – now – #Iranelection – Sea of Green – Allah Akbarin Baharestan we saw militia with axe choping ppl like meat – blood everywhere – like butcher – Allah Akbar -they catch ppl with mobile – so many killed today – so many injured – Allah Akbar – they take one of usthey pull away the dead into trucks – like factory – no human can do this – we beg Allah for save us -Everybody is under arrest & cant move – Mousavi – Karroubi even rumour Khatami is in house guardwe must go – dont know when we can get internet – they take 1 of us, they will torture and get names – now we must move fast -thank you ppls 4 supporting Sea of Green – pls remember always our martyrs – Allah Akbar – Allah Akbar – Allah Akbar
It is entirely possible Persiankiwi will be back tomorrow or some other time in the near future, there is no way of knowing. But if he is not, as his 37,000+ followers surely can attest, how extraordinarily tragic.
June 23, 2009
A new trend seems to be emerging in Democratic politics. While Democrats are on target to win additional Governorships and possibly a few Senate seats in 2010, some of the old guard establishment candidates are seeing their polls numbers lagging in their re-election campaigns. And they are turning to a tactic that would have been considered political suicide just five years ago–they are coming out for gay marriage.
Just a few days ago, Connecticut Senator Christopher Dodd, trailing 45%-39% in this latest poll to his Republican challenger Rob Simmons in a race for Dodd’s Senate seat, threw his hat into the equality ring.
My young daughters are growing up in a different reality than I did. Our family knows many same-sex couples – our neighbors in Connecticut, members of my staff, parents of their schoolmates. Some are now married because the Connecticut Supreme Court and our state legislature have made same-sex marriage legal in our state.But to my daughters, these couples are married simply because they love each other and want to build a life together. That’s what we’ve taught them. The things that make those families different from their own pale in comparison to the commitments that bind those couples together.And, really, that’s what marriage should be. It’s about rights and responsibilities and, most of all, love.I believe that, when my daughters grow up, barriers to marriage equality for same-sex couples will seem as archaic, and as unfair, as the laws we once had against inter-racial marriage.And I want them to know that, even if he was a little late, their dad came down on the right side of history.
Also trailing in his re-election bid, Governor of New Jersey Jon Corzine, behind ten points to his Republican counterpart Chris Christie, pledged his full support to gay marriage as well.
Gov. Corzine has made “marriage equality” for gays and lesbians a prominent piece of his reelection campaign, taking another step in his conversion on the issue and encouraging gay-rights advocates who hope to see same-sex marriage approved in New Jersey this year.In public speeches and private appearances, Corzine, who as recently as 2006 said he believed marriage should be between a man and a woman, has touted his support of same-sex marriage.In raising the issue, he has tried to draw a bright-line divide with his Republican opponent, Christopher J. Christie, who has said he would veto a bill allowing gay and lesbian couples to wed.
Now, this could be a coincidence, but with support for gay marriage or civil unions growing by the day–at least in the Northeast–and gay fundraisers threatening to abandon the Democratic Party over their apparent apathy towards gay rights, politicians might be realizing they have no choice but to do the right thing.
So the question is who’s next?
My money is on Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, the only incumbent with worse numbers than Dodd and Corzine. Reid sports a whopping 34% favorability rating in his home state of Nevada. And just to be clear, that is five points lower than his Republican counterpart Senator John Ensign, who just admitted to an affair with his married staffer.
Unfortunately Reid is, as former Post columnist Dan Froomkin put it, “a spineless embarrassment,” who also has to deal with this guy, so no one should hold their breath. But if there’s one thing you can count on Harry Reid for, it’s a timely flip flop.
June 23, 2009

Cubs great and Hall of Famer Ryne Sandberg said today that his fellow former Cubbie Sammy Sosa should not be barred from induction into the Baseball Hall of Fame because of his recent positive test in steriods:
“It’s something that’s against the law and against society,” Sandberg said. “It was cheating in the sport.“I think it has to be spoken very loud and clear on the stance, and baseball needs to stand as they have. I’m very, very satisfied with the testing program they have in place now. For a guy who’s tested positive today under what happens now, like Manny Ramirez, it almost takes an idiot to participate in that. For the society, for the up-and-coming players and youth out there, I don’t think those guys should be recognized at all.”
Until recently, I would have agreed. In fact, my relative apathy towards baseball this year is in part due to the fact that virtually every future Hall of Famer currently playing has either already been busted for taking steroids or is under a giant cloud of suspicion. But my vehemence that all of these scammer should be banned for life subsided substantially when reading the Op-Ed page of the New York Times last week.
In it, baseball historian Zev Chavets argues not only have players always cheated at baseball, but it has been just as despicable, and more importantly, has involved most of the biggest names in the sport’s history. Now, I have always been aware of the vague allegations that players have been taking “greenies” for decades, but I did not realize, nor I’m guessing did anyone else, what else has been going on since the invention of the game. His whole column is eye popping. Here’s an excerpt:
Since the dawn of baseball, players have used whatever substances they believed would help them perform better, heal faster or relax during a long and stressful season. As far back as 1889, the pitcher Pud Galvin ingested monkey testosterone. During Prohibition, Grover Cleveland Alexander, also a pitcher, calmed his nerves with federally banned alcohol, and no less an expert than Bill Veeck, who owned several major-league teams, said that Alexander was a better pitcher drunk than sober.In 1961, during his home run race with Roger Maris, Mickey Mantle developed a sudden abscess that kept him on the bench. It came from an infected needle used by Max Jacobson, a quack who injected Mantle with a home-brew containing steroids and speed. In his autobiography, Hank Aaron admitted once taking an amphetamine tablet during a game. The Pirates’ John Milner testified at a drug dealer’s trial that his teammate, Willie Mays, kept “red juice,” a liquid form of speed, in his locker. (Mays denied it.) After he retired, Sandy Koufax admitted the he was often “half high” on the mound from the drugs he took for his ailing left arm.
Sammy Sosa has been suspected of being the worst kind of fraud even before his test results leaked earlier this month. His bat once exploded all over the infield exposing cork he had been using to “bust out of a slump,” and in one of the most cowardly acts in perjury history, he claimed he did not speak English at the Congressional hearings on steroids, when he had been a gregarious favorite of reporters for close to a decade.
But if the sport’s philosphy has been “Anything Goes” for a century as opposed to just the last decade, then when it comes to the Hall, the standard should be should be the same: “Anyone Goes In.”
June 23, 2009

And it’s a tie.
They also weren’t said today, but in the early 1970s. Unfortunately, the off-hand quips were not part of the public record until early this morning, as the National Archives released 150 more hours of White House audio tape. As a consequence, we now have two more gems to add to Richard Nixon’s treasure trove of dark and nasty quotations.
“There are times when an abortion is necessary. I know that. When you have a black and a white. Or a rape.”
“What I really think is deep down in this country, there is a lot of anti-Semitism, and all this is going to do is stir it up,” Nixon said. At another point he said, “It may be they have a death wish. You know that’s been the problem with our Jewish friends for centuries.”
Anytime Nixon is mentioned, of course, I can’t help but think of his lifelong arch nemesis Hunter S. Thompson, who wrote, among many other anti-Nixon diatribes, Nixon’s quintessential obituary entitled “He Was A Crook.” Though written in 1994–well past his prime–the eulogy still rings true, especially in light of today’s revelations. The whole piece is worth a read, but here are the final two paragraphs just to give you a sense of Thompson’s no holds barred style:
Nixon’s spirit will be with us for the rest of our lives — whether you’re me or Bill Clinton or you or Kurt Cobain or Bishop Tutu or Keith Richards or Amy Fisher or Boris Yeltsin’s daughter or your fiancee’s 16-year-old beer-drunk brother with his braided goatee and his whole life like a thundercloud out in front of him. This is not a generational thing. You don’t even have to know who Richard Nixon was to be a victim of his ugly, Nazi spirit.He has poisoned our water forever. Nixon will be remembered as a classic case of a smart man shitting in his own nest. But he also shit in our nests, and that was the crime that history will burn on his memory like a brand. By disgracing and degrading the Presidency of the United States, by fleeing the White House like a diseased cur, Richard Nixon broke the heart of the American Dream.
June 23, 2009
Christopher Hitchens wonders aloud about the mental stability of the ruling mullahs in Iran:
It is a mistake to assume that the ayatollahs, cynical and corrupt as they may be, are acting rationally. They are frequently in the grip of archaic beliefs and fears that would make a stupefied medieval European peasant seem mentally sturdy and resourceful by comparison.
It’s beginning to look like he has a point. It seems nothing the Supreme Leader has done can stop the people from protesting–whether he uses threats, intimidation, or outright killing. In fact, his tactics have been backfiring on him, like in the case of Neda, the unarmed girl caught on camera being gunned down by the Basij, who has become an international rallying cry.
So it’s on that note that yesterday he not only to continued his ruthless and tyrannical crackdown on his own people, but he apparently decided to be a giant asshole about it as well.
The Iranian authorities have ordered the family of a student shot dead in Tehran to take down mourning posters as they struggle to stop her becoming the rallying point for protests against the presidential election.Neda Salehi Agha Soltan, 26, was killed as she watched a pro-democracy protest, and mobile phone footage of her last moments have become a worldwide symbol of Iran’s turmoil.The authorities had already banned a public funeral or wake and have prevented gatherings in her name while the state-controlled media has not mentioned Miss Soltan’s death.
Along with removing any posters of Neda and banning a public wake or funeral for her, the government also told the people they were not allowed to pray for her whatsoever.
That’s right–the Grand Ayatollah of a religious theocracy told his countrymen yesterday they weren’t allowed to pray.
Neda Agha Soltan, 27, was dubbed the Angel of Freedom after a video which appeared to show her being shot by a government sniper was posted on the internet.Graphic scenes show Neda – her name means “the call” – walking with her father among demonstrators, then separately when she was shot as well as attempts to save her life.The Iranian authorities have now sent out a circular to mosques banning collective prayers for the woman.
Now, the Wall Street Journal is reporting government officials are charging a “bullet fee” for the return of dead bodies killed by….the government.
Upon learning of his son’s death, the elder Mr. Alipour was told the family had to pay an equivalent of $3,000 as a “bullet fee”—a fee for the bullet used by security forces—before taking the body back, relatives said.
One has to wonder after this Basij militiaman was done going on this rampage, did he follow up by giving the car a parking ticket?
June 22, 2009
There have been many fascinating articles published over the last week that try to explain today’s situation in Iran through the prism of the country’s 1979 Revolution, and to better understand the situation they now face, you should read as many as you can get your hands on.
Unfortunately for the English reader, all the Kh names can get a little confusing. But it’s actually really simple. One was the Supreme Leader, one was the President, and one was the President who became the Supreme Leader. Get it? Good.
All kidding aside, know this: the key to the future of the country lies in the hands of another former President of Iran–and more importantly the current chairman of the Assembly of Experts–with an equally hard to pronounce name: Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani:
Looking past their fiery rhetoric and apparent determination to cling to power using all available means, Iran’s hardliners are not a confident bunch. While hardliners still believe they possess enough force to stifle popular protests, they are worried that they are losing a behind-the-scenes battle within Iran’s religious establishment.A source familiar with the thinking of decision-makers in state agencies that have strong ties to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said there is a sense among hardliners that a shoe is about to drop. Ali Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani — Iran’s savviest political operator and an arch-enemy of Ayatollah Khamenei’s — has kept out of the public spotlight since the rigged June 12 presidential election triggered the political crisis. The widespread belief is that Rafsanjani has been in the holy city of Qom, working to assemble a religious and political coalition to topple the supreme leader and President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.“There is great apprehension among people in the supreme leader’s [camp] about what Rafsanjani may pull,” said a source in Tehran who is familiar with hardliner thinking. “They [the supreme leader and his supporters] are much more concerned about Rafsanjani than the mass movement on the streets.”
June 21, 2009
WASHINGTON (AFP) – A Canadian journalist working in Iran for Newsweek magazine was detained without charge by Iranian authorities Sunday, the magazine said, adding that Maziar Bahari had not been heard from since.“Newsweek strongly condemns this unwarranted detention, and calls upon the Iranian government to release him immediately,” the New York-based weekly news magazine said in a statement.It said Bahari, who has been living and covering Iran for the past decade, was “detained without charge by Iranian authorities and has not been heard from since.”“Mr Bahari’s coverage of Iran, for Newsweek and other outlets, has always been fair and nuanced, and has given full weight to all sides of the issues. He has worked well with different administrations in Tehran, including the current one,” it said.The statement noted that as many as 20 journalists and bloggers are reported to have been detained since Iran’s June 12 elections, which set off mass protests after official results gave incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a landslide victory.
What makes this story even more curious is Mr. Bahari was featured in an interview done by Daily Show correspondent Jason Jones on his visit to Iran in the lead-up to the election. The segment just aired this past Wednesday.
In it, Mr. Bahari tries to clear up Western misconceptions about Iranians while emphasizing commonality with the United States. Of course, he does this as Jason Jones satirically tries to enforce every possible negative stereotype Americans may have about Iran, and as you can see, Mr. Bahari more than holds his own.
| The Daily Show With Jon Stewart | Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c | |||
| Jason Jones: Behind the Veil – Minarets of Menace | ||||
|
||||
I sincerely doubt that the Supreme Leader watches Comedy Central, but the timing is interesting nonetheless.



