Personally, from what I saw, Hillary seemed to have a more concrete idea of what her plans as president (though it’s the action that counts) than did Obama, but her presentation did/does not go over well, evidenced by the reaction to most of her comments. In the case of the whole Bosnian incident, and think her flippancy might have been an attempt at some witty confidence, because from what I’d seen, she exhibited some pretty useless aggression in her campaigns, and what, I thought, was the conscientious effort to be clever and cocky. It was a bad move.

Her trying to get away from a more serious image to play bad boys’ hardball is probably what did her in, as cockiness isn’t what America is looking for, and really does not stand up to Obama’s person-to-person openness. The fact that she doesn’t appear to be honest didn’t help either.

In short, she’s no different than most other politicians.

Hillary is best where she was, like Sarah Palin (who is, honestly, kind of embarrassing), she shouldn’t have attempted a position for which she isn’t compatible.